Well, it is the weekend, and the first nice sunshine-y green springy weekend I have experienced since moving back to Grand Rapids from Martha's Vineyard, MA in December.
Things I am excited about:
->My church just gave me this nifty piece of gear
->I finished recording neverland
That's all for now.
Tuesday, March 6, 2007
What don't I like about iTunes 7.1? Basically, it is this:
Why give us a way to pretend like we're 'flipping through our albums' without giving us the sensory experience of actually playing them?
What I'm saying is, I want to see the vinyl, I want to see it spinning. I want to hear the needle pop when I listen to the same records too much. Apple could even get rich selling virtual record needles on the iTunes store.
We even have motion-sensitive Macbooks now - Apple could even code in some amazing feature to allow the pitch to change slightly if our computer is bumped or if the room is too shaky.
Geez guys, what are you even thinking? Ah well. That is the beauty of the decimal system. Let's not move past 7.1.1 without some serious attention to these things, shall we?
Posted by JVH at 8:47 PM
Sunday, February 18, 2007
->editing the piano roll
Please forgive me if this is old hat for you, but many people I know that use (or at least have) Garageband have no idea that this feature even exists, or they would probably spend twice as much time using it. I'm not quite sure why they don't make this feature more apparent in the help files, but then again, who reads help files? I have no idea where I'd be without this key feature, though. Just hit the apple key when you are in the loop editor mode and edit your MIDI sequences until the cows come home.
->exporting audio files (the real reason for this post)
When I first started using GarageBand I was terribly frustrated with the difficulty (unless you are a Logic user) of getting my creations out of GarageBand and into different software, like Pro Tools, for further work. It seemed that unless I wanted to go to Logic, which I personally don't enjoy working in, I was stuck exporting a lousy mp3 or m4a file. The "send song to iTunes" feature has proved a lifesaver in a few different situations.
All you have to do is a tricky little workaround:
1) open iTunes,
2) open your iTunes Preferences
3) set the importing options to the audio file type and quality of your choice (I use .wav for obvious reasons)
4) use the "Send Song to iTunes" feature in GarageBand and viola, (voila?) your freshly exported, high-quality audio file will appear in your iTunes playlist under some cheesy name like "Justin's Album."
5) import into the audio session of your choice in the software of your choice, to your heart's content! Oh, the self-indulgence of it all... make sure you are aware of where your iTunes files are located on your hard drive, obviously...
I used this method on some of the songs I recorded myself, most notably the synth solo on "When She Sleeps" (can you believe I liked a synth sound I created in GarageBand better than anything I could find on my roommate's Korg Triton?) as well as some of the random Moog-esque filter sweep sounds on "Its Fair."
Posted by JVH at 6:27 PM
I have spent the past year or so of my life as a "bedroom studio hobbyist", a label I'm sure many of you who might come across this article would probably give to yourselves. I get off on the endless creative possibilities that exist when a microphone and hard disk are available. I have done just about everything short of recording a full drum set in my bedroom.
I would say that home recording enthusiasts fall into two different categories when it comes their mentalities regarding the capability of their bedroom studio:
a) Category A people recognize the limits and shortcomings of the project studio, and use their equipment and resources (tastefully) in a way that reflects these limitations.
b) Category B people are frustrated with any kind of limitation whatsoever, and their fascination with the possibilities of digital recording leads them to continue to seek to push beyond the constraints of the home studio.
[warning: adopting a category B mentality could lead to hundreds of sleepless hours and lost time that could have otherwise been spent contributing to either society or at least your own well-being]
What I will be covering today is most likely old hat for many of you, but I'm sure there are those out there trying to make your home recordings sound as good as possible who can't seem to get past the massive obstacle that is guitar tone.
As a disclaimer, let me state that my favorite recordings (although I am open to being proven wrong) still exist in the form of a) as much live tracking as possible to capture the vibe of the band as true to form as can be, and b) guitar tones achieved using good guitars, good players, tube-based guitar amplifiers, and careful miking technique.
However, one thing that all aspects of recording have in common is the human ear - and my favorite recordings are not the result of an engineer blindly following tradition or prescribed techniques, but rather learning to capture what sounds best - therefore, I submit this information simply as a way to add to the ever-growing list of possibilities for capturing guitar sounds.
Now, I do all my tracking using a digital audio interface and a laptop computer so for me there exists no "computer-less" method but in terms of the way you are processing the guitar, these methods fall into the above category appropriately.
A simple and (generally) affordable solution would be a multi-effects processor which acts as a preamp - there are all sorts of guitarists who use this as a live solution too, from Sunday morning hobbyists to professional touring players. Line 6 has long enjoyed a loyal following with their POD hardware, and the PODxt "Live" model is quite a versatile and hard-working piece of gear. Other brands include M-Audio's "Black Box" and the Behringer "V-Amp." I don't have much experience with the latter two, but also be aware that manufacturers are more and more likely to include USB capability (the POD does already) to make it easier to bypass a few steps in your path to excellent, albeit simulated, guitar tone.
Keep in mind the differences in level between various types of audio signals. I use an MBox so I can switch my preamp mode between "mic", "line", and 'instrument' effortlessly, but you may need to have a direct box standing by if you do not have such convenience.
"In The Box" Methods
Those of us who were initially fascinated with the possibilities of plug-ins in our sequencing/multi-track software were no doubt prone to wonder what else could be done with this concept - if we can use a piece of software to perform standard audio processing tasks like compression and equalization, why stop there? Hence, a new generation of software was born, what I like to call 'softamps.'
The two leaders in the field are Cakewalk's Amplitube and Native Instruments' Guitar Rig. I personally favor Guitar Rig right now but most software developers offer pretty full-featured demo modes of their software on their websites so you can feel free to feel them out for yourself if you decide to expand in this way.
My favorite way to use this software is in "Standalone" mode - your computer in a sense then becomes your amplifier, as well as your pedal board or rack, and can even act as your engineer, changing microphone placement or any number of variables.
Keep your signal chain in mind. I have an older PC laptop that I use as a host for programs like this so I don't have too much running at the same time - but there are many different ways to use this software. Before I had two computers I used the PC laptop as both, though I had two audio interfaces - one would power Guitar Rig and the other would power my sequencer.
You can also use this software as a plug-in in most sequencers, (they generally come in VST, RTAS, and AU formats as well as standalone mode) something I have done once in awhile but not often because of CPU load, etc.
Some amplifiers also have a "pre-amp out" output in the form of a 1/4" jack that will enable you to capture the sound of the guitar (minus the tonal characteristics given to the sound by the speaker - which, depending on your gear, could be something you shouldn't bypass) without using a microphone. Combining a method like this with tasteful processing in the mixdown can have great results.
Also, make sure you're not missing any of the basics in the first place when it comes to recording guitars, and hey, might as well get some more advice from a great site like TweakHeadz Lab before you dive in too deep.
Posted by JVH at 5:39 PM